Nothing publishes until a person says so
- Reviewers see the real asset
- Change requests attach to one deliverable
- Approvals recorded against a version
Businesses across North America use Glowtify to get seen.
Review and approval, where the content lives
Reviewers see the real thing
Invite anyone on your team. They open the campaign with the content in it and comment on the asset itself, not on a pasted paragraph.
Change requests land on the asset
A comment attaches to the deliverable it is about. You fix that one, the rest keeps moving.
Approval is recorded, not remembered
Who approved what, when, and against which version. That matters when the claim is a tolerance or a lead time.
Reviewers
Three states, one decision
Pick your reviewers
Anyone in the workspace. Marketing, sales, engineering, the plant manager who has to stand behind the number.
They approve or ask
A change request lands on the deliverable it is about. The rest of the campaign keeps moving.
It publishes on approval
Once signed off it goes out or schedules. Who approved what, and against which version, is recorded.
What it will not do
Approval is not optional
There is no setting that skips it to go faster. If nobody approves, nothing goes out, and the campaign says so on its face.
It is not a legal sign-off trail
It records who approved which version and when. That is an audit trail for your team, not a compliance certification.
Straight answers
Can reviewers edit, or only comment?
Both, depending on how you invite them. A reviewer can request a change or fix it directly.
Does a change request block the whole campaign?
No. It holds the one deliverable it is attached to. The other pieces stay on schedule.
Do reviewers need a paid seat?
Anyone you invite to the workspace can review. Check the pricing page for how seats are counted.
Get the draft out of the email thread.
Reviewers open the campaign with the content in it, and approval is recorded where the work lives.




